Plans for £7.5m Helensburgh community wind farm submitted

A photomontage of how the turbines could look from Rosneath
A photomontage of how the turbines could look from Rosneath

Plans have been formally submitted for the Helensburgh Community Wind Farm, a £7.5m project which could generate 4MW of electricity annually for 25 years.

The potential view from Lomond School's sports field in Helensburgh
The potential view from Lomond School’s sports field in Helensburgh

The project promises to generate at least £40,000 per year for good causes in Helensburgh although its site at Tom na h-Airidh hill is actually in Rhu and Shandon Community Council’s area.

Profits from the five 86,5-metre turbines would be split three ways, between landowners Luss Estates, Green Cat Renewables Ltd and Helensburgh Community Development Trust.

The application to Argyll and Bute Council includes dozens of photomontages and a 260-page Environmental Impact Assessment.

This argues against last year’s scoping report by the council – first revealed here – which said that 50-metres would be the maximum height for turbines in that area, saying with restriction at least 16 turbines would have been needed.

And fears that the development would affect tourism are dismissed – although the bizarrely the area’s leading tourism attraction is listed as ‘Helensburgh Launderette’, with the Charles Rennie Mackintosh masterpiece Hill House in second place.

Top tourism attraction?
Top tourism attraction?

The report argues: “During the lifespan of the project it is likely that investment by the Helensburgh Community Trust in local projects and improvement schemes will create jobs, both in the long and short term.

“If the road and garden improvements and beach front regeneration should go ahead then local contractors will be used to carry out this work.

“Similarly, if the food bank, community centre, and youth groups are set up then this will create a number of both full and part time jobs within the local community.”

It adds that more than £1.5m of the construction spending would be with local business, from electrical and civil engineering companies to fencers and hoteliers.

A 50-metre anemometer mast at the site was given planning permission earlier this year, but the report acknowledges that the wind farm itself will create ‘a degree of visual and environmental impact’.

The possible view from the A817 Haul Road through Glen Fruin
The possible view from the A817 Haul Road through Glen Fruin

The council’s scoping report is acknowledged, but the report responds: “It is our contention that the proposed design sits well within the landscape context and is appropriate for the location.

“We believe that the potentially adverse effects resulting from the proposal will be off-set by the positive effects associated, notably in terms of the contribution it will make to the local economy, regional energy objectives and national renewable energy targets.

“It was found that as well as relating well to the local landscape the addition of this development would not serve to dominate or control the horizon, creating a well-balanced and uncomplicated wind turbine layout that was in scale with the landscape.

“The considered location down the eastern slope of Tom na h-Airdh was found to mitigate the visual prominence effect of the development, offer additional screening from local topography and make use of Tom na h-Airdh as a backdrop.

“This resulted in a significant reduction in the potential landscape and visual impact from key sensitive areas such as the National Park.”

The plan was first announced in January 2013 and since then 14 local consultation events have been held, although these led to just 65 questionnaires being completed; the team have urged locals to ‘be pragmatic’ and support the plan.

Access to the site would be from the A818, and it would be expected to generate annually an electricity output of approximately 9,800MWh – equivalent to the average domestic consumption of over 2,200 homes.

Full details, including more photomontages, are available at the council’s website – look for application number 14/01674/PP


  1. Here we go again, when will developers take note of council comments and regulations that these WT are above the specified height within A&B Council regulations (50m). How much money will be spent and wasted trying to get this application through. If we look at the last WF Application in Cove and Kilcreggan and read the councils comments then, is this not just a waste of more tax payers time and money?
    I just hope people read these comments and then they will see that these developers are just trying to run ruff shot over the council and their rules and regulations. Why are these regulations put in place which takes up a great deal of time and effort by both communities and council to produce, only to be ignored?
    It will be very interesting to see public comments over the coming days on this application on A&B planning site. Hopefully the promise of pennies will not entice people to agree with this application and make comment noting this.

  2. How can we take seriously a document which says a laundrette is a tourist attraction? How many other errors dies it contain? I notice reference to English Nature – how is that relevant in Scotland? A complete waste of money and time

  3. More tosh from a council who only recently were barrelling oublic money into a scheme to secure revenue from celebrating the centenary of the first world war.

  4. Yes, and would it be cynical to comment on the Argyll and Bute council proposal to then the lights off in commemoration of the War.
    Maybe they could add some air raid sirens too.

  5. I notice that several of the photo montages have lovely blues skies as background to the turbines – contrary to SNH guidelines, I believe.
    And yes- why do the developers believe that all the professional input,to the LDP and LWECS can be ignored ?
    The Scottish Government approved the policies after all!

  6. Scottish Natural Heritage [SNH] has today published updated guidance on the visual representation of wind farms to produce consistency in planning applications and to help councils and the public to understand and consider potential impacts on landscapes, views and panoramas.

    With the above in mind will the developers now have to re-submit new photomontages? it will be interesting to see if this is the case. It would also be good to get feedback from the developers, being has they need the publics support. In their statements they have indicated that they will be happy to answer our question!!! I wait their response.

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. ‘We can make a difference on wind farm plan’, villagers are told « The Lochside Press
  2. Evidence on wind farm plan ‘disturbing’, says community group « The Lochside Press

Comments are closed.